A therapist struck off as a intercourse pest is again treating sufferers once more.
Peter Orwell was kicked out as an osteopath for critical sexual misconduct. He had groomed a weak affected person for his personal sexual gratification, a panel discovered.
Now the Mail has found he’s again working as a therapist – providing ‘palms on therapy’.
When he was struck off in 2015, the Normal Osteopathic Council (GOsC), the UK regulator for osteopaths, described Mr Orwell as posing ‘a unbroken threat of hurt to different sufferers’.
It eliminated him from its register, saying there was ‘an actual chance’ he would repeat his sexually motivated misconduct.
Peter Orwell was kicked out as an osteopath in 2015 for critical sexual misconduct, however has now been discovered working once more as a ‘musculoskeletal therapist ‘at his clinic in Plumstead, south London, in addition to at sufferers’ personal houses
Now he has a brand new web site providing massages. Mr Orwell not refers to himself as an ‘osteopath’, however as a ‘musculoskeletal therapist’.
He fees £70 for a one-hour session at his clinic in Plumstead, south London, or at sufferers’ personal houses.
Below present UK rules, therapeutic massage therapists don’t want a licence. There’s one accredited register, the place a member of the general public can lookup a masseur.
However as a result of it’s voluntary, consultants say solely a minority are signed up. Mr Orwell, who’s in his fifties, doesn’t seem like a member.
Contacted by the Mail, he declined to remark.
When he was a registered osteopath, he groomed a youthful affected person to encourage her to really feel protected with him – earlier than permitting her to undress utterly bare after which contact her intimately as she lay on his therapy desk, a panel discovered.
Mr Orwell requested her about her intercourse life and instructed she use intercourse toys, which the skilled conduct committee concluded was a ‘reckless’ and critical breach {of professional} requirements.
In its 2015 ruling, the GOsC concluded Mr Orwell had ‘groomed Affected person A, a weak affected person, for his personal sexual gratification’ and ‘abused his skilled place so as to have the ability to contact her intimately with out protest’.
After being contacted by The Mail, Mr Orwell modified his web site, eradicating many of the content material and changing it with the phrases ‘coming quickly’ (pictured)
It added: ‘The committee was happy that [Mr Orwell’s] conduct taken cumulatively fell critically wanting the usual anticipated of a registered osteopath.
‘The committee was happy that his conduct was deplorable.’
The committee discovered Mr Orwell had dedicated ‘a critical abuse of his place of belief in relation to a weak affected person’ and likewise ‘posed a unbroken threat of hurt to different sufferers’.
The Normal Osteopathic Council introduced: ‘Mr Orwell is now unable to practise as an osteopath.’
Mr Orwell has continued to see sufferers, though he not known as himself an osteopath, however a ‘well being advisor’ or a ‘therapist’.
He has been holding common ‘musculoskeletal remedy’ periods at a clinic in Plumstead.
His web site states: ‘I consider within the therapeutic energy of palms on therapy’. He guarantees ‘personalised care’ and says: ‘My philosophy is centred round offering a protected and cozy setting the place my sufferers can loosen up and rejuvenate their thoughts, physique and spirit.’
At-home massages have change into more and more in style, however a current BBC radio File On 4 investigation discovered dozens of girls have been sexually assaulted by therapeutic massage therapists in their very own houses.
Specialists are calling for the federal government to introduce stricter regulation in a sector that has little oversight.
The Mail reached Mr Orwell by phone to ask why he was treating sufferers regardless of the GOsC warning he posed a hazard, however he ended the decision and didn’t reply to follow-up messages.
He later modified his web site, eradicating many of the content material and changing it with the phrases ‘coming quickly’.
The Normal Osteopathic Council stated: ‘If somebody who has been faraway from our register is practising as a unique form of unregulated therapist and never an osteopath, at present there isn’t any additional motion we will take.
‘The GOsC would strongly urge all sufferers to see solely healthcare professionals who’re registered.
‘For the best stage of safety, select a practitioner that’s regulated.’
