PICTURED: High solicitor who urged feminine workers to put on brief skirts to work earlier than being suspended after having intercourse with junior lawyer twice on his desk is a ‘well-known’ household man dwelling in an Essex mansion

A prime solicitor who has been suspended for 2 years after having intercourse with a junior lawyer twice on his desk and telling feminine workers to put on brief skirts is a ‘well-known’ household man dwelling in an Essex mansion, MailOnline can reveal.

Jasvinder Gill, a senior accomplice at a legislation agency, abused his ‘place of authority and affect’ on the agency and pursued sexual relationships with a number of ladies, a tribunal discovered. 

The 50-year-old lives in a lavish Essex property together with his spouse, their two youngsters and different members of his prolonged household. Quite a lot of luxurious vehicles, all with non-public quantity plates lined the driveway of the gated mansion.

Mr Gill is seen lovingly beaming on the digicam clutching his youngsters whereas accompanied by his spouse in footage.

One native mentioned: ‘The entire household is sort of well-known round right here and have completed fairly properly for themselves. They have an attractive home and like many profitable Indian enterprise households, desire to stay collectively.’

Mr Gill has been suspended for 2 years at a Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal [SDT] and ordered to pay £85,501 prices.

Within the footage, Mr Gill lovingly beams on the digicam clutching his youngsters whereas accompanied by his spouse

The tribunal discovered that the lawyer flirted with one junior lawyer after she joined, kissed her within the workplace, and romped along with her on his desk.

Mr Gill informed feminine workers members that he ‘most well-liked feminine workers to put on open toe sneakers, stockings and never tights, and brief skirts’ – and described it as ‘correct workplace apparel’.

The panel criticised Mr Gill for abusing the ‘energy imbalance’, saying his conduct in direction of 4 ladies made them fearful their profession would undergo in the event that they rejected him.

The SDT tribunal heard Mr Gill behaved inappropriately in direction of junior feminine colleagues between October 2015 and September 2020, when he was between the ages of 41 and 46.

The identify of the agency was redacted, nevertheless the tribunal heard its web site describes Mr Gill because the ‘Senior Accomplice with general duty for the daily administration of the agency and for guaranteeing excessive ranges of consumer satisfaction’.

The tribunal heard that Mr Gill struck up a sexual relationship with ‘Individual A’ after she joined the agency in October 2015.

He invited her to a pub lunch then requested her to come back to his workplace the place he kissed her on the lips.

Gill (pictured) has been suspended for 2 years at a Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal [SDT] and ordered to pay £85,501 prices

Throughout their relationship, Mr Gill informed Individual A ‘that he most well-liked feminine workers to put on open toe sneakers, stockings and never tights and brief skirts’, describing this gown as ‘correct workplace apparel’.

In November 2019, shortly after junior lawyer ‘Individual B’ joined the corporate, he invited her to his lodge room throughout a piece journey to Bristol.

He took her to his room to order takeaway pizza, became his loungewear and laid on the mattress.

He additionally provided her an alcoholic beverage whereas she sat on the mattress ready for pizza, and on one other event joked a couple of youngster wanting up Individual B’s skirt.

Mr Gill repeatedly entered the workplace that Individual A shared with Individual B, stroking Individual A’s hair and giving her a shoulder therapeutic massage, whereas Individual B was current.

Between April 2019 and October 2020, he additionally started a sexual relationship with ‘Individual C’ after she joined the agency.

It was heard Mr Gill recurrently kissed with Individual C whereas his workplace door was closed, recurrently flirted along with her, and put his hand on her knee once they kissed.

Mr Gill even had intercourse with Individual C on his desk twice, it was heard.

He informed Individual C he cherished summer time as a result of he acquired to see her ‘carrying a brief, flowery summer time gown with no tights’.

A fourth girl, Individual D, was additionally informed that there was a ‘most well-liked’ workplace gown code of ‘skirts, reasonably than trousers and excessive heels’.

She recalled being quizzed by Mr Gill on what she thought of stockings and when she was going to put on a gown.

The panel discovered that Mr Gill’s behaviour was inappropriate and pushed by his sexual wishes.

Alison Banks, chair of the SDT panel, mentioned Mr Gill was ‘an skilled and properly regarded solicitor who had constructed a thriving enterprise, but, admittedly, he had carried out himself in direction of extra junior workers in a manner which was unsuitable and inappropriate’.

She added: ‘[Gill] had, on repeated events, used his place of affect and authority within the office to create conditions by which workplace relationships, sexual in intent, had been initiated and pursued by him.

‘His motivation had been a sexual one and his conduct positioned the feminine workers who he had picked upon with the little doubt unsettling dilemma that rebuffing him would or may depend in opposition to them of their persevering with employment inside the agency and the resultant difficulties of leaving the agency and looking for new employment.

‘Even with the advantage of the mitigation utilized in his favour, [Gill’s] misconduct may solely be considered as extraordinarily regarding and really severe.

The Tribunal concluded {that a} solicitor with integrity with such a senior place would have acknowledged the ‘energy imbalance’ in these relationships.

They added that such a person would have realised his actions had been ‘completely unacceptable inside the skilled setting of the office and deeply unsettling for the workers generally, and feminine workers particularly.’

Mr Gill, who certified in 1999, supplied mitigation in relation to his well being.