Fraudster, 49, is spared jail for stealing £74,580 from her ‘extremely susceptible’ brain-damaged father and splurging the money on Amazon and iTunes after she was entrusted to take care of his cash following highway crash

  • The courtroom heard that Tamara Whiting commited a ‘clear abuse of energy’ 
  • The fraud went on for over a decade earlier than it was uncovered 

A fraudster who callously stole nearly £75,000 from her personal father after he suffered critical mind injury following a highway accident has averted jail time. 

Hull Crown Court docket heard that in a ‘clear abuse of energy’ Tamara Whiting withdrew cash that was awarded to her father for his accidents by way of money machines whereas additionally spending it on items and to repay bank card payments. 

Whiting continued her spending spree utilizing her father’s money for a ‘sustained time frame’, spanning over a decade, earlier than it was ultimately found and investigated. 

The 49-year-old from Rokeby Park in west Hull has been handed a two 12 months suspended jail sentence after she admitted fraud.  

Between January 15 and October 2, 2007 Whiting made money withdrawals for the good thing about herself whereas within the place of Receiver of his cash.

Tamara Whiting (pictured) has averted jail time after she callously stole nearly £75,000 from her personal father after he suffered critical mind injury following a highway accident 

Hull Crown Court where Whiting from Rokeby Park in west Hull has been handed a two year suspended prison sentence after she admitted fraud (stock image)

Hull Crown Court docket the place Whiting from Rokeby Park in west Hull has been handed a two 12 months suspended jail sentence after she admitted fraud (inventory picture)

Whiting additionally admitted that between September 30, 2007 and February 21, 2018 she had withdrawn cash from her father’s checking account to the worth of £24,000.

Ashleigh Metcalfe, prosecuting, mentioned that, in July 1995, Whiting’s father suffered mind accidents after a highway accident and his psychological capability was severely impacted. 

His former spouse was appointed because the Receiver of cash involving him. A compensation award of £180,000 was made following the accident.

The courtroom heard that the couple separated in 2005 and a divorce was finalised. In Might 2007, the accident sufferer was moved from the matrimonial residence to sheltered lodging.

In June 2006, the ex-wife was discharged as his Receiver and Whiting took over that duty. Her father died in June 2022 on the age of 71.

It was later found that Whiting fraudulently obtained a complete of £74,580 in money withdrawals and funds to corporations equivalent to Amazon and iTunes in addition to bank card compensation corporations. Many of the lacking cash was money withdrawals.

Miss Metcalfe mentioned: ‘There was a transparent abuse of energy’. 

‘The fraudulent exercise was over a sustained time frame. The funds are being recouped by the Court docket of Safety.’ 

Whiting continued her spending spree using her father's cash for a 'sustained period of time', spanning over a decade, before it was eventually discovered and investigated

Whiting continued her spending spree utilizing her father’s money for a ‘sustained time frame’, spanning over a decade, earlier than it was ultimately found and investigated 

Whiting was given a two-year prison sentence, suspended for two years, and 240 hours' unpaid work

Whiting was given a two-year jail sentence, suspended for 2 years, and 240 hours’ unpaid work

She added that Whiting’s father was ‘clearly a extremely susceptible particular person’ on the time.

Stephen Robinson, mitigating, mentioned that ‘sadly’ Whiting stole cash that she was purported to be chargeable for safeguarding on behalf of her father. 

‘She is repaying the cash,’ mentioned Mr Robinson.

Whiting did ‘deserve’ to go to jail and he or she realised how shut she had come to doing so. She had no earlier convictions. There have been two references for her.

Recorder Tahir Khan KC mentioned: ‘She stole cash from her father whereas she was purported to be taking care of his funds. She is a low threat of additional offending.’

Whiting was given a two-year jail sentence, suspended for 2 years, and 240 hours’ unpaid work. 

‘For those who commit an extra offence over the course of the following two years, you run the chance of being introduced again to courtroom and having to serve the 2 years that I’ve imposed,’ mentioned Choose Khan. 

He added: ‘Let’s not have you ever again earlier than the courtroom.’

About bourbiza mohamed

Check Also

Rishi runs defence whereas Keir parks his tanks in Tory heartlands: How the social gathering leaders racked up the miles – and laid naked what they count on will occur on July 4 – in brutal election marketing campaign

Rishi Sunak’s previous few days on the overall election marketing campaign path have seen him …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *